Healthcare Metric Source Review Decisions
Compact reviewer decision page. Version 9 adds row-level Auto Populate Investigate, decision filters, metric descriptions, and larger note fields.
Data safety note: This version uses a full CSV parser. Reviewer notes may include URLs, commas, quotes, and line breaks without splitting rows.
Resolution cue: The first column now shows whether the row is still pending, needs field mapping, has a replacement suggested, or has no follow-up required.
Files
Decisions CSV: C:\WEB\VoiceToCongress.com\40 - Top Issues\020 - Healthcare\_issue_support\metrics\review\healthcare_source_review_decisions.csv
Worklist CSV: C:\WEB\VoiceToCongress.com\40 - Top Issues\020 - Healthcare\_issue_support\metrics\review\healthcare_source_review_decision_worklist.csv
Summary TXT: C:\WEB\VoiceToCongress.com\40 - Top Issues\020 - Healthcare\_issue_support\metrics\qa\healthcare_source_review_decision_worklist_summary.txt
| Total Rows | Follow-up Required | No Follow-up | Auto Approved | Review Recommended | Stale |
| 44 | 44 | 0 | 16 | 27 | 1 |
Suggested workflow: review official sources first. If the metric description is missing, do not guess; use Reviewer Notes to record that the metric definition must be enriched. Use Auto Populate when the current source URL should be investigated, or manually add Investigate: URL in Reviewer Notes when you found a better data page. Use Preview Investigate first, then Apply Investigate only after the proposal looks right, then run field-map/promoter scripts when needed. Set Follow-up to NO only when the source is resolved.